__
|
__|__
|
__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Gautier DE ST-MARTIN ______|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--Raoul ("Ralph") DE WARENNE
| (.... - 1050)
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_(niece of Duchess GONNOR) _|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|__|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
[4373] Raoul was a benefactor of the Abbey of Trinite de Mont in the middle of the 11th century. {-per "Falaise Roll," M.J.Crispin (1938), p.52} Some give another wife, Emma, who is asserted as mother of his son, William. See http://www.mathematical.com/mortimerroger.html in 2003 for a discussion of this ancestry and its problems. In 2003 http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/cp/surrey.shtml offers: "corrections and additions to the Complete Peerage: Volume 12, Part 1, pages 491-3 (as modified by volume 14): RODULF DE WARENNE I ... is said to have held land outside the walls of Rouen under Robert I, Duke of Normandy (d. 1035) ... He also held land at Vascoeuil (dept. Eure), which he gave about 1053 to the abbey of St. Pierre des Préaux,(c) and in the pays de Caux, north of Rouen, where he sold 4 churches with tithes to the Holy Trinity in 1059, and gave another church, also with tithes, in 1074. He m. Beatrice, whose mother was almost certainly a sister of Gotmund Rufus DE VASCOEUIL, [and] da. of Tesselin, Vicomte of Rouen.(f) She was living about 1053. RODULF DE WARENNE II, 1st s. and h., is known only from his subscriptions to two charters of his father for the Holy Trinity of Rouen. As his father's lands near Rouen and in the pays de Caux did not pass to his son William or William's descendants, it is likely that Rodulf suc. to them on his father's death; he m. Emma, whose parentage is unknown.(d) 1. WILLIAM DE WARENNE I was 1st s. of Rodulf II. Page 491, note g (continuation on p. 492): The entries for Rodulf I and Rodulf II need considerable revision, see "Aspects of Robert of Torigny's Genealogies revisited", K.S.B. Keats-Rohan, Nottingham Med. Studies, vol. 37, 1993, pp. 21-4. Page 492, note c: Stapleton, Archaeological Journal, vol. iii, p. 11. His 1st wife Beatrice consented. Loyd points out that Vascoeuil had formed part of the ducal demesne (op. cit., p. 98); and it seems likely that the land there was brought in by Beatrice. Note f: Keats-Rohan, op. cit. above, p. 24. Beatrice is there shown to have probably been a great-niece of Gunnor, 2nd wife of Richard I, Duke of Normandy. Page 493, note d: See Keats-Rohan, op. cit., p. 22. Keats-Rohan's suggestion that Beatrice was a great niece of Gunnor must be viewed as somewhat conjectural. It is an attempt to explain Robert de Torigny's statement that William de Warenne I's (unnamed) mother was a niece of Gunnor, which is chronologically difficult because it seems to leave too few generations between Gunnor and William. Keats-Rohan's suggestion relies on the evidence that Beatrice was the daughter of Tesselin, vicomte of Rouen, in conjunction with Robert de Torigny's statement that a (different) niece of Gunnor married a vicomte of Rouen. But he actually specifies Richard, vicomte of Rouen, who was Tesselin's son. (An alternative conjecture might be that William de Warenne's mother Emma was a great niece, rather than a niece, of Gunnor.) In Keats-Rohan's revised version, the dates originally given in relation to Rodulf I and his supposed 2nd wife, now apply to the marriage of Rodulf II and his wife Emma - they were married in or before 1059, and were both living in 1074 [cf. vol. 12, part 1, p. 492, notes h and i, citing Cart. Ste Trinité, nos xxix and xxxv]. The charter evidence shows that Rodulf II and Emma had an elder son Rodulf III and a younger son William I. The statement about the Warenne lands in Normandy relates to Rodulf III, and should read something like this (with the original conclusion restored): As Rodulf II's lands near Rouen and in the pays de Caux did not pass to his younger son William I or William's descendants, it is likely that his elder son Rodulf III suc. to them on Rodulf II's death; and as part of these lands had passed to the barons of Esneval by 1152, it is likely that Rodulf III married and left issue. [Stewart Baldwin pointed out Keats-Rohan's revision in June 1996; the problem was subsequently discussed by Alan Wilson, Todd Farmerie and others.] Volume 12, part 1, page 511: He [John (de Warenne), Earl of Surrey (d. 1347)] d. s.p.m. 29 June 1347.(i) Note i: ... His heir was Richard, Earl of Arundel, s. of his sister Alice (Cal. Close Rolls, 1346-49, pp. 338-41). As he had illegitimate sons but left a nephew as heir [Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, vol. 9, no 54], what should be said here is that he died without legitimate issue (as stated in the first edition of Complete Peerage), not without male issue." See "Medieval English Ancestors of Certain Americans," Carl Boyer III (Santa Clarita, CA, 2001), p. 258.
__
|
__|__
|
______________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Andrew HAFFER ___________|
| (1755 - 1791) |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |______________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--Mary HAFFER
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| _Peter DRUCKENMILLER _|
| | (.... - 1790) |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_Elizabeth DRUCKENMILLER _|
(.... - 1809) |
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|______________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
[277] Mary m. John Dauberman. She is known from signing a release for the sale of her mother's parental homestead. Mary is also named in her father's estate papers (File 24, Northumberland Co. Court House, Sunbury, PA).
_Ziemovitus, Duke of POLAND ____________+
| (.... - 0892)
_Lescus IV, Duke of POLAND _____|________________________________________
| (.... - 0921)
_Ziemomislas, Duke of POLAND ____________|
| (.... - 0964) |
| | ________________________________________
| | |
| |________________________________|________________________________________
|
_Miesco I (Duke 964-992), Duke of POLAND _|
| (0931 - 0992) m 0965 |
| | ________________________________________
| | |
| | ________________________________|________________________________________
| | |
| |_________________________________________|
| |
| | ________________________________________
| | |
| |________________________________|________________________________________
|
|
|--Boleslaw I "Lionhearted", King of POLAND
| (0967 - 1025)
| _Borivorius I, Duke of BOHEMIA _________+
| | (.... - 0910)
| _Wratislaus I, Duke of BOHEMIA _|_Saint Ludomilla, Countess of MIELNICK _
| | (0888 - 0921) (.... - 0927)
| _Boleslaus I The Cruel, Duke of BOHEMIA _|
| | (.... - 0967) m 0987 |
| | | ________________________________________
| | | |
| | |_Drahomira of STODOR ___________|________________________________________
| | (.... - 0937)
|_Dabrowka of BOHEMIA _____________________|
(.... - 0977) m 0965 |
| ________________________________________
| |
| ________________________________|________________________________________
| |
|_Emnildis of POLAND _____________________|
(.... - 1017) m 0987 |
| ________________________________________
| |
|________________________________|________________________________________
Boleslaw I: "A born warrior, he raised the little struggling Polish principality on the Vistula to the rank of a great power. ...At his death in 1025 he left Poland one of the mightiest states of Europe, extending from the Bug to the Elbe, and from the Baltic to the Danube, and possessing besides the overlordship of Russia." {-Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1956 Edition, 3:806.} He reigned 992-1025; was called "Chroby" ("the Mighty"). In 1000 he secured from Emperor Otto III an end to the tribute which Miesco had agreed to pay, and creation of an independent Polish church headed by a metropolitan and Gneizno. He was Duke, then King. His wife was Judith of Ungarn.
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1981, Micropaedia, Vol II, p. 127, Boleslaw I the Brave: "Polish Boleslaw I Chrobry, Born 966/967, Died 17 Jun 1025, first king of Poland, who expanded his country's territory to include Pomerania, Lusatia, and, for a time, the Bohemian princely lands, and made Poland a major European state; he also created a Polish Church independent of German control. Son of Mieszko I, the first of the Piast Dukes, and the Bohemian Princess Dobrawa (Dubravka), Boleslaw I inherited the principality of Great Poland (Wielkopolska, between the Oder and the Warta rivers) upon his father's death (992). He conquered Pomerania (on the Baltic Sea) in 996 and seized Cracow (formerly a Bohemian possession) soon afterward. He ransomed the relics of the martyred St Adalbert,Bishop of Prague, from the pagan Prussians and buried the relics at Gniezno. The Holy Roman emperor Otto III, who had been Adalbert's student and Boleslaw's ally since 992, attended the ceremony (Mar 1000) and marked the occasion by personallycrowning Boleslaw King of Poland. With Pope Sylvester II's approval, the Emperor granted Poland its own archdiocese, with Gniezno as its seat. Boleslaw then reorganized Poland's church structure, making it a national church directly under papal jurisdiction and independent of German ecclesiastical control. After Emperor Otto III's death (1002), Boleslaw seized the imperial lands of Lusatia and Misnia (Meissen) and the principality of Bohemia. These actions started a series ofthree wars between him and the German king Henry II; it lasted until 1018, when, by the Treaty of Bautzen, Boleslaw retained Lusatia and Misnia, and Henry II won Bohemia. Boleslaw's expansionist policy continued. When he defeated Grand Prince Yaroslav I the Wise of Kiev in battle (21 Jul 1018) and placed his own son-in-law (and Yaroslav's brother) Svyatopolk, on the Kievian throne, his control extended from the western tributaries of the middle Elbe to the eastern reach of the Western Bug River. Though recognized as King by Otto III in 1000, he sought to strengthen his position and his independence from imperial control by being crowned by the Archbishop of Gniezno (25 Dec 1024)."
Macropaedia, Vol XIV, p. 638, History of Poland : "...The eldest son of Mieszko I, Boleslaw I the Brave, further enlarged his empire, going beyond the ethnic boundaries of the Polish tribes. With Boleslaw's help, the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III set up his own Polish metropolitanate (church province), with the bishoprics of Cracow, Wroclaw, and Kolobrzeg, and the archbishopric of Gniezno, at the Congress of Gniezno (1000). The first bishop of Prague, Adalbert (Voytech), became the national patron saint of Poland in that year,following his martyrdom in 977 during his missionary work with the heathen Prussians in Samland in east Prussia. When Otto III died, Boleslaw I conquered Bohemia, Moravia, the German borderlands in Lusatia (Lausitz), west of the Oder River, andprobably also Slovakia between 1003 and 1004. But the new king of Germany, Henry II (ruled 1002-1024), reconquered Bohemia and also led three campaigns against Boleslaw I, without success. In 1018 Boleslaw turned east, occupying Kiev for a short period and regaining the borderland at the Bug and San rivers, which had belonged to Poland before 981. Boleslaw I was crowned king (presumably withthe consent of the Holy See in Rome) in 1024-1025, and the new kingdom became gradually knownunder the name of Poland (Polonia) even during his reign. After his death the Polish monarchy came to be the secular symbol of the country's unity, in spite of all the partitions and divisions that the future held in store."
Boleslaw's life and times are dramatically portrayed in "The Last Apocalypse: Europe at the Year 1000 A.D.," James Reston, Jr. (New York: Doubleday, 1998), chapter 5.
[27166]
[S1]
LDS Church's Ancestral File - not verified.
[27167]
[S1]
LDS Church's Ancestral File - not verified.