[23825] Duplicated as Sir Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk in this database. http://www.mowfam.freeserve.co.uk/page34.htm offers in 2003: "Thomas Mowbray - born 22 March 1365/6 (1366 in our present system), Thomas was of the blood royal through his mother, who as noted earlier, was descended from Thomas of Brotherton, Earl of Norfolk and a son of Edward I. This was the first son of the family to be named Thomas and it is said his mother had him baptised so to mark her special reverence for St. Thomas of Canterbury, murdered in that cathedral as Thomas a'Becket. Aged 17 on the death of his elder brother, Thomas inherited, in addition to great Mowbray barony in which were merged those of de Brewes and Segrave, the expectation of the still more splendid heritage of the Bigod family, previous Earls of Norfolk. Thomas and the future Richard II had been boyhood companions. By charter of 12 February 1383, Richard II revived in favour of his young cousin the title of Earl of Nottingham which Thomas's brother had borne. Before October 1383, Thomas was given the Garter made vacant by the death of old Sir John Burley. In the summer of 1385 thomas was present in the expedition against the Scots which the king conducted in person. On the eve of departure, Thomas was conferred with the office for life of Earl Marshall of England. This office passed down through his descendants, and through the Howard line of his daughter Margaret (q.v.) so that the present-day Duke of Norfolk still retains the office. On the march northwards through Yorkshire, Thomas, with many English knights in witness, confirmed his ancestor Roger de Mowbray's charter of land to Byland Abbey. Barely twenty years of age when the nobles rebelled at Court in October 1386, Thomas had been much in the company that year of the similarly-aged king. His name does not appear amongst those of the rebels, although he had married in 1385 a sister of Thomas, Earl of Arundel, who was the chief author of the revolution. In March 1387 he participated in the naval victory achieved by Arundel over the French, Flemings and Spaniards. He did not however accompany Arundel in the subsequent conquest of the castle of Brest The two were received vey coldly by the Richard II when they predented themselves to report success, so they retired to their estates to get out of harm's way. Relations were obviously very strained between the cousins at the time, because Thomas was one of those whose destruction the king and his favourite, the Duke of Ireland, plotted after Easter. Yet Thomas does not seem to have taken any part in the armed demonstration in November by which Gloucester, Arundel and Warwick extorted from Richard a promise that his advisers should be brought before Parliament. It was not until the after the three lords had had fled from the court, and the Duke of Ireland was approaching with an army to relieve the king from constraint, that Thomas followed the example of Derby and appeared in arms with Derby and the other three lords at Huntingdon on 12 December 1387. Even now, if we can trust the story which Thomas and Derby told ten years later (when they were assisting Richard in bringing their old associates into account for these proceedings) they showed themselves more moderate than their elders. They claimed to have secured the rejection of Arundel's plan to capture and depose the king. The five confederates marched instead into Oxfordshire to intercept the Duke of Ireland before he could pass the river Thames. They divided their forces for the purpose on 20 December, and Thomas, like some of the others,seemingly did not come up in time to take part with Derby and Gloucester in the actual fighting at Radcot Bridge, from which the Duke of Ireland only escaped by swimming! The victors returned through Oxford, with Arundel and Thomas bringing up the rear. After spending Christmas Day at St. Albans they reached London on 26 December and encamped in the fields at Clerkenwell. As the London populace was siding with the formidable host encamped outside the city walls, the mayor opened the gates to the lords. they insisted on an interview with Richard in the Tower of London, and entered his presence with linked arms. the helpless young king consented to meet them next day at Westminster, and asked them to sup and stay the night with him, in a token of goodwill. Gloucester refused but Richard succeeded in keeping Derby and Thomas to supper. Next day they formally accused the king's favourites of treason at Westminster, and Richard was forced to order their arrest. As one of the five appellants Thomas took part in the so-called Merciless Parliament which met 3 February 1388. On 10 March, as Marshall, he was joined by Gloucester, as Constable, to hear a suit between Matthew Gournay and Louis de Sancerre, Constable of France. In the early months of 1389 he is said to have been sent against the Scots, who were ravaging Northumberland, but being entrusted with only 500 lances he did not venture an encounter with the Scottish force of 30,000. On 3 May of the same year, Richard shook off the tutelage of of the appellants, and Thomas and the others were removed from the Privy Council. But once his own master, Richard showed particular anxiety to conciliate the Earl Marshall, giving him overdue (Thomas being 23) livery of his lands, and a week later placing him on a commission appointed to negotiate a truce with Scotland. The great possessions of Thomas in the north, as well his grandfather's career in a similar capacity, must have suggested this employment. On 1 June, therefore, he was constituted warden of the East Marches (the eastern area on the English side of the Border), captain of Berwick-on-Tweed, and constable of Roxburgh Castle for a term of two years. By the middle of September both he and Derby had been restored to their places at the council board, which a month later was the scene of a hot dispute between Richard and his new chancellor, William of Wykeham, who resisted Richard's proposal to grant a large pension to Thomas. Whatever may have been the king's real feelings towards Gloucester and Arundel at this time, it was obviously to his interest to attach the younger and less prominent appellants to himself. Thomas was continuously employed in the service of the state and entrusted with responsible commands. On 28 June 1390, he was associated with the Treasurer, John Gilbert, Bishop of St. David's, and others to obtain redress from the Scots for recent infractions of the truce. In 1391 in an exchange of posts between him and the Earl of Northumberland, the latter returned to the office of Warden of the Marches, while Thomas Mowbray took the captaincy of Calais. In November 1392, this office was renewed to him for six years together with that of lieutenant of the king in Calais, Picardy, Flanders and Artois for the same term. On 12 January 1394, Richard II recognized Thomas' just and hereditary right to bear for his crest a golden leopard with a crown ( in addition to the Mowbray coat of arms). In March of that year Thoams was appointed chief justice of North Wales, and two months later justice of Chester and Flint. That September, Thomas accompanied Richard to Ireland, and on his retutn was commissioned with others to negotiate a long truce with France and a marriage for the king with Isabella, daughter of Charles VI of France. He was present at the costly wedding festivities at Calais in October 1396. Thomas thus closely indentified himself with the French connection, which by its baneful influence on Richard's character and policy, and its unpopularity in the country contributed more than anything else to hastening his misfortunes. In the parliament of January 1397, Richard gave thomas another signal proof of his favour by an express recognition of the Earl-Marshalship of England as hereditary in the Mowbray family, and permission to bear a golden truncheon on his arms, bearing the royal arms on the upper side and his own on the lower. At the same time Thomas secured a victory in a personal quarrel with the Earl of Warwick, whose father had, in1352, obtained legal recognition of his claim to lordship of Gower, a part of the Mowbray inheritance. this judgement was reversed in Thomas' favour. Thomas was out of England from the end of February until the latter part of June on a froeign mission, but returned to serve as one of the instruments of Richard's revenge on Gloucester, Arundel and Warwick, his fellow-appellants of 1388. how far Thomas' conduct was justifiable is a matter of opinion, but it is not unnatural. He was the last to join the appellants and probably the first to be rconciled to the king, and now for eight years had been loaded with exceptional favours. He had long drifted apart from his old associates, and with one was at open enmity. It must be confessed too that he was a considerable gainer by the destruction of his old friends. According to the king's story, thomas and seven other young courtiers, all of whom were related to the royal family, advised Richard to arrest Gloucester, Arundel and Warwick on 8 and 9 July. At Nottingham on 5 August, they agreed to appeal them of treason in the parliament which had been summoned to meet at Westminster on 21 September. Thomas was present when Richard in person arrested Gloucester at his castle of Pleshy in Essex, and it was to his care as captain of Calais that the duke was consigned. He may have himself conducted his prisoner to Calais, but his prescence at Nottingham on 5 August proves he did not mount guard personally throughout the imprisonment. He had for some time been performing his duties at Calais by deputy. On Friday 21 September, Thomas and his fellow-appellants "in red silk robes, banded with white silk and powdered with letters of gold", renewed in parliament the appeal they had made at Nottingham. Arundel was forthwith tried, condemned and beheaded on Tower Hill. Popular belief as early as 1399 has it that Thomas led Arundel (his father-in-law) to execution, bandaged his eyes and performed the act, but he official record has it that the despatching was carried out by Thomas' lieutenant. On the same day, the king issued a writ, addresses to Thomas as captain of Calais, or his deputy, to bring up the Duke of Gloucester before parliament to answer the charges of the appellants.Parliament seems to have been adjourned to Monday 24 September, when Thomas' answer was read, curtly intimating he could produce the duke, as he had died in his custody at Calais. Next day a confession, purporting to have been made by Gloucester, was read in parliament, and the dead man was found guilty of treason. the whole affair is shrouded in mystery, and there is a strong suspicion that Richard and Thomas were responsible for Gloucester's death, as shortly after the accession of Henry IV, a certain John Hall, servant to Thomas (who was by then dead), being arrested as an accomplice in the murder of Gloucester, deposed in writing to parliament that he had been called from his bed by Thomas one night in September 1397, had been informed that the king had ordered Gloucester to be murdered, and had been enjoined to be present with other esquires and servants of Thomas and of the Earl of Rutland. Hall had at first refused, but Thomas struck him on the head and said that he should obey or die. He then took an oath of secrecy with eight other squires and yoemen, whose names he gave, in the church of Notre-Dame in the presence of his master. Thomas then took them to a hostelry called Prince's Inn, and there left them. Gloucester was handed over to them by John Lovetot, and was suffocated under a feather bed. Hall was at once condemned, without being produced, and executed. However, Thomas' guilt is not proved, though the balance of evidence is against him. His services, whatever their extent, were rewarded on 28 September 1397 by a grant of the greater part of the Arundel estates in Sussex and Surrey, and of seventeen of the Earl of Warwick's manors in the midlands. The commons representing to the king that Derby and Thomas had been "innocent of malice" in their appeal of 1388, Richard vouched for their loyalty. On 29 September, Thomas was created Duke of Norfolk, and his grandmother Margaret, Countess of Norfolk, was at the same time created Duchess of Norfolk for her life. But new wealth and honours did not render Norfolk's position inviolable. the king was vindictive by nature, and had not forgotten that Norfolk was once his enemy; heafterwards declared that thomas had not persued the appeal of his old friends with such zeal as those who had never turned their coats. At the same time the inner circle of the king's confidantes - the Earl of Kent (now Duke of Surrey), sir William le Scrope (now Earl of Wiltshire), and the Earl of Salisbury were urging the king to rid himself of all who had ever been his enemies. Thoams is said to confided his fears to Henry Bolingbroke, Duke of Hereford (and the future Henry IV) as they rode From Brentford to London in December 1397. Richard was informed of Norfolk's language; obtained from Hereford, who prbably was jealous of Thomas' power, obtained a written account of the interview with norfolk, and summoned both parties to to appear before the adjourned parliament, which was to meet at Shrewsbury on 30 January 1398. Hereford appears to have accompanied the king on his way to Shrewsbury, for on 25 January, Richard gave him a full pardon for all treasons and other offences of which he may have been guilty in the past. Thomasw did not appear to answer the charges which Hereford then presented against him, and on 4 February, the king ordered his sheriffs to proclaim that he must appear within fifteen days. At Oswestry on 23 February, Norfolk was present and gave full denial to the charges, and it was settled by the king and council at Bristol that unless sufficient proofs of guilt were forthcoming in the meantime, the matter should be referred to a court of chivalry at Windsor. The court met on the day appointed, and decided that the matter should be settled by trial of battle at Coventry on 16 September. The lists were prepared at Gosford Green outside the city, and on the day the combatents duly appeared. they were both magnificently arrayed, Thomas, we are told having secured his armour from Germany, and Hereford's being a present from Gian Galeaxzo of Milan. Before they joined issue, however, the king took the battle into his own hands, on the grounds that treason was in question, and that it was undesirable that royal blood should be dishonoured by the defeat of either. Richard then decided that inasmuch as Thomas had confessed at Windsor to some of the charges which he had repelled at Oswestry, and was thus self-convicted of conduct which was likely to have roused great trouble in the kingdom, he should quit the realm before the octaves of of St. Edward, to take up his residence in Germany, Bohemia and Hungary, and "pass the great sea in pilgrimage". He was to go nowhere else in Christendom on pain of incurring the penalties of treason. Hereford was banished to France for ten years, and communication between them was expressly forbidden. the same veto was laid upon all intercourse with Archbishop Arundel. Thomas' share of the lands of Arundel and Warwick, and all his offices were were declared forfeited, because he had resisted the abrogation of of the acts of the 'Merciless Parliament', and failed in his duty as an appellant. the rest of his estates were to be taken into the king's hands, and the revenues, after paying him 1,000 pounds a year, were devoted to covering the heavy losses in which it was alleged his maladministration of his governorship of Calais had involved the king. Next day his office of Marshal of England was granted to the king's nephew, Thomas Holland, Duke of Surrey. On 3 October the king ordered his admirals to allow free passage to Norfolk from any port between Scarborough and Orwell; licensed the duke to take with him a suite of 40 persons, 1,000 pounds in money, with jewels, plate and harness, and issued a general request to all princes and nations to allow him safe-conduct. A few days later, Thomas took ship near Lowestoft, for Dordrecht, in the presence of several country gentry, who testified to the fact, and added that by sunset he was six leagues and more fro that port, and was favoured with with "bon vent et swef". Of the subsequent wanderings of the banished Thomas Mowbray, we know no more than that he reached Venice, where on 18 February 1399 the senate, at the request of King Richard, granted him (disguised in their notes as the Duke of 'Gilforth') the loan of a galley for his intended visit to the Holy Sepulchre. He induced some private Venetians to advance him money for his journey, on the express undertaking, inserted in his will, that their claims should rank above all others. On the death of Thomas' grandmother, Richard revoked the law by which Thomas had been able to receive inheritances by attorney, and thus prevented him from enjoying - even in exile - the revenue of the old Bigod (earls of Norfolk prior to Edward I ) estates. It cannot be regarded as certain that he ever made his journey to Palestine, for he died at Venice on 22 September of the same year (1399). the register of Newburgh Priory says, however, that it was after his return from the Holy Land, and that he died of the plague. He was buried in Venice, and through his son John left instructions in his will that his ashes should be brought to England. Nothing seems to have been done until his descendant, Thomas Howard, third Duke of Norfolk, preferred a request for them to the Ventian authorities in December 1532 through the Venetian ambassador in London. Thomas left lands in most counties of England and Wales, whose mere enumeration fills eleven closely printed folio pages in the 'Inquisitiones Post Mortem'. He was twice-married. his first wife, Elizabeth, dau. of John/Roger(?), Lord Strange of Blackmere, died almost immediately and in 1385 he married Lady Elizabeth Fitz-Alan dau of Richard, Earl of Arundel, sister and co-heir of Thomas, Earl of Arundel and widow of William de Montacute, by whom he had issue: 1. Thomas who simply bore the title of Earl Marshal. 2 John, restored as Duke of Norfolk. 3 Isabel, through whom the title of earl of Nottingham eventually passed to the Berkeleys. 4 Margaret, through whome the title of duke of Norfolk eventually passed to the Howards. 5 Elizabeth, whose issue became extinct." {See Faris, David. Plantagenet Ancestry.} Cf. http://www.thepeerage.com/p98.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Mowbray,_1st_Duke_of_Norfolk.
__
|
__|__
|
__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Robert D'IVRY ______|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Ascelin GOEL _______|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| | __|
| | | |
| | | | __
| | | | |
| | | |__|__
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--William DE LOVEL
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | | __|__
| | | |
| | |__|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|__|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
[40739] See "Royal Ancestors of Magna Charta Barons," Carr P. Collins, Jr. (Dallas, TX: self published, 1959), p. 172, which states William m. Maud (Albeaade) de Beaumont whi was living in 1189.Ancestry.com offers: "Lovell Name Meaning - English: nickname from Anglo-Norman French lo(u)ve 'female wolf' (feminine form of lou, from Latin lupus) + the diminutive suffix -el."
__
|
__|__
|
_Gottschalk I DE TROGNEE _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Gottschalk (II ?) DE MORIALME _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__________________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Gottschalk (III ?) DE MORIALME _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| | __________________________|
| | | |
| | | | __
| | | | |
| | | |__|__
| | |
| |________________________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__________________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--Arnaud II DE MORIALME
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
| ________________________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | | __|__
| | | |
| | |__________________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_Hedwig DE MAN __________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|________________________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|__________________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
[4913] Arnaud II was Lord of Morialme, Ham-sur-Heure, and received Bailleul and Belloeil through marriage.
[54215] The unverified file 9HFV-3QL in familysearch.org offers: "When Elizabeth Emerson was born on 14 June 1623, in Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, England, her father, Thomas Emerson, was 38 and her mother, Elizabeth Brewster, was 38. She married John Fuller of Ipswich on 15 April 1638, in Ipswich, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America. They were the parents of at least 6 sons and 4 daughters. She died on 24 September 1689, in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, at the age of 66."
_________________________
|
_John FOLSOM _________|_________________________
| (.... - 1681) m 1638
_Peter FOLSOM ________|
| |
| | _________________________
| | |
| |_Mary GILMAN _________|_________________________
| m 1638
_Peter FOLSOM _______|
| (.... - 1718) m 1700|
| | _________________________
| | |
| | ______________________|_________________________
| | |
| |_(not ENTERED) _______|
| |
| | _________________________
| | |
| |______________________|_________________________
|
_John FOLSOM ________|
| (1709 - 1790) |
| | _Edward GILMAN __________+
| | | (.... - 1613)
| | _Edward GILMAN _______|_________________________
| | | (1587 - 1655) m 1614
| | _John GILMAN _________|
| | | (1624 - 1708) m 1657 |
| | | | _________________________
| | | | |
| | | |_Mary CLARK __________|_________________________
| | | (1590 - 1681) m 1614
| |_Catherine GILMAN ___|
| (1684 - 1717) m 1700|
| | _John TREWORGYE _________
| | | (1562 - 1620)
| | _James TREWORGYE _____|_________________________
| | | (.... - 1650) m 1617
| |_Elizabeth TREWORGYE _|
| (1626 - 1719) m 1657 |
| | _Alexander SHAPLEIGH ____
| | | m 1597
| |_Catherine SHAPLEIGH _|_Marguerite BLOEDEL _____
| (1599 - 1676) m 1617 (1585 - 1602)
|
|--John FOLSOM
|
| _Anthony BRACKETT _______
| | (1586 - ....)
| _Anthony BRACKETT ____|_________________________
| | (1613 - 1691)
| _Thomas BRACKETT _____|
| | (1635 - 1676) m 1664 |
| | | _________________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|_________________________
| |
| _Joshua BRACKETT ____|
| | (1666 - 1749) m 1698|
| | | _________________________
| | | |
| | | _Michael MITTON ______|_________________________
| | | | (1617 - ....) m 1637
| | |_Mary MITTON _________|
| | (.... - 1676) m 1664 |
| | | _George CLEEVE __________+
| | | | (.... - 1667) m 1618
| | |_Elizabeth CLEEVE ____|_Joan (or Joanna) PRICE _
| | (1619 - 1682) m 1637 (1584 - 1663)
|_Eleanor BRACKETT ___|
(1712 - 1781) |
| _Leonard WYKE ___________+
| | (.... - 1626)
| _John (IV) WYKE ______|_________________________
| |
| _Leonard WEEKS _______|
| | (1633 - 1707) m 1666 |
| | | _________________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|_________________________
| |
|_Mary Haines WEEKS __|
(1676 - 1740) m 1698|
| _________________________
| |
| _John REDMAN _________|_________________________
| | (1615 - 1700)
|_Mary REDMAN _________|
(1649 - ....) m 1666 |
| _Robert KNIGHT __________+
| | (1585 - 1676) m 1608
|_Margaret KNIGHT _____|_Margaret GRIMLEY _______
(.... - 1658) (1587 - ....)
[19076]
[S1]
LDS IGI - not verified
_____________________
|
___________________________|_____________________
|
____________________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |___________________________|_____________________
|
__________________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | ___________________________|_____________________
| | |
| |____________________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |___________________________|_____________________
|
_Gary D. HARSHBARGER ____|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | ___________________________|_____________________
| | |
| | ____________________________|
| | | |
| | | | _____________________
| | | | |
| | | |___________________________|_____________________
| | |
| |__________________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | ___________________________|_____________________
| | |
| |____________________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |___________________________|_____________________
|
|
|--Tammy Lou HARSHBARGER
|
| _John SWARNER _______+
| | (1785 - 1864) m 1826
| _Henry SWARNER ____________|_Rebecca BIXLER _____
| | (1837 - 1920) (1800 - 1862)
| _George Washington SWARNER _|
| | (1868 - 1946) m 1892 |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_Catharine STRICKLER ______|_____________________
| | (1836 - 1908)
| _George Clarence SWARNER _|
| | (1900 - 1962) m 1923 |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | | _Asa Garrett CLAWSON ______|_____________________
| | | | (1830 - 1885) m 1857
| | |_Mary Elizabeth CLAWSON ____|
| | (1870 - 1944) m 1892 |
| | | _Hiram HOOVER _______+
| | | | (1809 - 1867)
| | |_Rebecca Elizabeth HOOVER _|_____________________
| | (1842 - 1885) m 1857
|_Pearl Margaret SWARNER _|
|
| _____________________
| |
| ___________________________|_____________________
| |
| ____________________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |___________________________|_____________________
| |
|_Ava Margaret CLEMMER ____|
(1905 - 1985) m 1923 |
| _____________________
| |
| ___________________________|_____________________
| |
|____________________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|___________________________|_____________________
[19464] living - details excluded
______________________
|
______________________|______________________
|
__________________________|
| |
| | ______________________
| | |
| |______________________|______________________
|
_Charles LASKEY ___________|
| (1869 - 1952) m 1889 |
| | ______________________
| | |
| | ______________________|______________________
| | |
| |__________________________|
| |
| | ______________________
| | |
| |______________________|______________________
|
_Samuel Hudlow LASKEY _|
| (1903 - 1985) m 1923 |
| | ______________________
| | |
| | ______________________|______________________
| | |
| | _Thomas Rainsford ORSER __|
| | | (1835 - 1920) m 1857 |
| | | | ______________________
| | | | |
| | | |______________________|______________________
| | |
| |_Minnie Mabel ORSER _______|
| (1864 - 1937) m 1889 |
| | ______________________
| | |
| | _Stephen BRITTON _____|______________________
| | | (1802 - 1874) m 1825
| |_Harriet Adelia BRITTON __|
| (1841 - 1917) m 1857 |
| | ______________________
| | |
| |_Lydia Ann SHAW ______|_Abigail Hood KENNEY _
| (1809 - 1869) m 1825 (1789 - 1885)
|
|--Henry Lindon LASKEY
| (1926 - 2021)
| ______________________
| |
| ______________________|______________________
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | | ______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|______________________
| |
| _Penrose Havelock WICKETT _|
| | (1867 - 1940) m 1891 |
| | | ______________________
| | | |
| | | ______________________|______________________
| | | |
| | |__________________________|
| | |
| | | ______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|______________________
| |
|_Grace Hilda WICKETT __|
(1902 - 2001) m 1923 |
| ______________________
| |
| ______________________|______________________
| |
| _William Wallace BABCOCK _|
| | (1842 - 1923) m 1867 |
| | | ______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|______________________
| |
|_Myrtle Ivy BABCOCK _______|
(1872 - 1932) m 1891 |
| ______________________
| |
| _Levi Dingley CURTIS _|______________________
| | (1819 - 1901)
|_Mary Ann CURTIS _________|
(1847 - 1915) m 1867 |
| _James DOWNES ________
| | (1796 - 1881) m 1818
|_Sarah T. DOWNES _____|_Chloe TWINING _______
(1829 - 1895) (1800 - 1841)
[57186] Find A Grave memorial 232727270 offers: "Henry Lindon Laskey, 94, went home to be with his Lord and Savior on October 1, 2021. He passed away peacefully at home after a long illness. He was born November 14, 1926, in the village of Great Works in Old Town, Maine, the second son of Samuel H. and Grace (Wickett) Laskey. Henry grew up in Old Town, attended local schools, and graduated with highest honors from Old Town High School on June 12, 1945, as valedictorian of his class. Henry was drafted into the United States Army and entered basic training on June 19, 1945, at Fort McClellen, AL. He began service in a rifle company and was later transferred to a heavy weapons company. The war ended in August 1945, and Henry was shipped to Italy in November 1945. He spent a year there, serving in the Army of Occupation in the 88th Infantry Division. Henry became a dental technician working in a field hospital. He returned home for Christmas in 1946 and was honorably discharged from the Army on February 7, 1947. Henry enrolled at the University of Maine in Orono, ME, in September 1947, where he studied mechanical engineering. He became a member of Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society in October 1950, and graduated in May 1951, with highest distinction, receiving a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering. After graduation from college, Henry was employed in the engineering department of Ingersoll-Rand Company in Painted Post, NY. While working and living there, he met Doris Wolverton through a co-worker, the late Alvin 'Schooni' Schoonover, who was Doris' first cousin. Henry and Doris were married on August 14, 1954, at North Baptist Church in Corning, NY. They moved to Old Town, ME, in April 1955, and together they raised four sons. While in Old Town, Henry first worked at Eastern Fine Paper Company in Brewer, ME, and then became an instructor in the mechanical engineering dept. at the University of Maine in 1958. He also earned his Master of Science degree in mechanical engineering during that time. In 1963 Henry was employed by the Oxford Paper Company in Rumford, ME, and the family relocated to the western Maine area for the next 12 years. In 1975 the family relocated again to the greater Portland, ME, area, where Henry was employed as a senior process engineer in the pulp and paper group at the E. C. Jordan Company. In 1987 he was employed by Simons Eastern Company for several years, and then retired in July 1990. Henry's career in engineering was centered around the pulp and paper industry, and his projects took him to many paper mills throughout Maine and the nation. Always central to Henry's life was his faith in Jesus Christ. He and his family were members of several churches over the years, including United Baptist Church in Old Town, ME, First Baptist Church in Mexico, ME, Faith Baptist Church in North Yarmouth, ME, First Baptist Church in Portland, ME, and Hope Baptist Church in Manchester, ME. Henry loved his church families like his own, and gave generously of his time and resources to each of them. During his long retirement, Henry enjoyed his hobby of family genealogy, and wrote and published several books on the Laskey, Wickett, and Wolverton families. In September 2015, Henry's beloved wife Doris passed away after 61 years of marriage. He then moved to Granite Hill Estates in Hallowell, ME, where he made many great friends. In June 2019, Henry had the honor of traveling to Washington, D.C. with Honor Flight Maine with his son, David. He considered it to be one of the great experiences of his lifetime. Henry was predeceased by his wife, Doris; his parents; a brother, Samuel H. Laskey Jr., who died in childhood; a sister, Mae Goodin; a sister, Sandra Drennen; and a brother, Thomas Laskey. He is survived by son, Samuel and Polly Laskey and grandsons, Michael and Matthew; son, David and Laurie Laskey and grandson, Andrew; son, Timothy Laskey and Laurie Benjamin and granddaughters, Elisabeth and Natasha, and grandson, Joseph; and son, Mark and Susan Laskey and grandson, Zachary. Henry is also survived by a sister, Sylvia Weatherbee; a sister, Shirley and Steve Folsom; a brother, Harold and Donna Laskey; a brother, Douglas and Iris Laskey; and many nieces, nephews, and great-grandchildren."
_____________________________________
|
_William RIDGELY ____________________|_____________________________________
| (1645 - 1716)
_William RIDGELY _________|
| (1678 - 1719) m 1702 |
| | _____________________________________
| | |
| |_Elizabeth, wife of William RIDGELY _|_____________________________________
|
_William RIDGELY ____|
| (1704 - 1780) m 1726|
| | _George (Sr.) (Westall or) WESTHALL _
| | |
| | _George (Jr.) WESTHALL ______________|_____________________________________
| | | (.... - 1701)
| |_Jane (Westhall) WESTALL _|
| (1682 - 1748) m 1702 |
| | _Robert WADE ________________________+
| | | (1637 - 1694)
| |_Sarah WADE _________________________|_____________________________________
|
_Greenberry RIDGELY _|
| (1734 - 1815) |
| | _____________________________________
| | |
| | _James ORRICK _______________________|_____________________________________
| | |
| | _James ORRICK ____________|
| | | (1687 - 1715) m 1709 |
| | | | _____________________________________
| | | | |
| | | |_____________________________________|_____________________________________
| | |
| |_Mary ORRICK ________|
| (.... - 1771) m 1726|
| | _____________________________________
| | |
| | _____________________________________|_____________________________________
| | |
| |_Priscilla RULEY _________|
| (1690 - 1773) m 1709 |
| | _____________________________________
| | |
| |_____________________________________|_____________________________________
|
|
|--Noah RIDGELY
| (1778 - 1856)
| _____________________________________
| |
| _____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________________________
| | | |
| | | _____________________________________|_____________________________________
| | | |
| | |__________________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _____________________________________
| |
| _____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _____________________________________
| |
| _____________________________________|_____________________________________
| |
|__________________________|
|
| _____________________________________
| |
|_____________________________________|_____________________________________
[29214] "Anne Arundel Gentry, Vol. 3," Harry Wright Newman (Lord Baltimore Press, 1933), pp. 172-173 provides information about Noah and his family. He served on the Baltimore City Council in 1827. His son, Henderson Ridgely, acting Adjutant General with the 4th U.S. Infantry, killed in action near Matamoras.
_Simon STONE ________+
| (1450 - 1510)
_David STONE ________|_____________________
| (.... - 1543)
_Simon STONE ________|
| (.... - 1557) |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|_____________________
|
_David STONE _____________________|
| (1540 - 1625) m 1584 |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | _____________________|_____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|_____________________
|
_Deacon Gregory STONE _|
| (1592 - 1672) |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | _____________________|_____________________
| | |
| | _____________________|
| | | |
| | | | _____________________
| | | | |
| | | |_____________________|_____________________
| | |
| |_Ursula, 2nd wife of David STONE _|
| m 1584 |
| | _____________________
| | |
| | _____________________|_____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|_____________________
|
|
|--Elizabeth STONE
| (1629 - 1713)
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
| __________________________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | | _____________________|_____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
|_Lydia Fiske COOPER ___|
(1595 - 1674) |
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
|__________________________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|_____________________|_____________________
[1043] Death date and place is from Marge Stockton [genestockton@cheerful.com] via Internet 6/98 and not verified; she provided children beside Samuel and their descendants and siblings, as well. See Paige, Lucius R., "Hist. of Cambridge MA, 1630-1877 with a Genealogical Register," 187; Reprint (Bowie, Maryland: Heritage Books, 1986).
_Richard (III) THAYER _+
| (1624 - 1695) m 1651
_Richard (IV) THAYER _|_Dorothy PRAY _________
| (1655 - 1705) m 1679 (1634 - 1705)
_John THAYER ________|
| (1688 - 1768) m 1715|
| | _James MCCALL _________
| | | (1620 - 1660)
| |_Rebecca MCCALL ______|_Mary FARR ____________
| (1658 - 1732) m 1679 (1644 - 1694)
_Micah THAYER _______|
| (1723 - 1802) m 1747|
| | _John FRENCH __________+
| | | (1622 - 1697) m 1640
| | _Dependence FRENCH ___|_Grace KINGSLEY _______
| | | (1649 - 1732) m 1688 (.... - 1681)
| |_Rebecca FRENCH _____|
| (1694 - 1762) m 1715|
| | _John FENNO ___________
| | | (1629 - 1708) m 1662
| |_Rebecca FENNO _______|_Rebecca TUCKER _______
| (1662 - 1741) m 1688 (1640 - 1690)
_Micah (Jr.) THAYER _|
| (1749 - ....) |
| | _John FRENCH __________+
| | | (1622 - 1697) m 1640
| | _Dependence FRENCH ___|_Grace KINGSLEY _______
| | | (1649 - 1732) m 1688 (.... - 1681)
| | _John FRENCH ________|
| | | (1689 - 1768) m 1710|
| | | | _John FENNO ___________
| | | | | (1629 - 1708) m 1662
| | | |_Rebecca FENNO _______|_Rebecca TUCKER _______
| | | (1662 - 1741) m 1688 (1640 - 1690)
| |_Mehitable FRENCH ___|
| (1727 - 1773) m 1747|
| | _______________________
| | |
| | _John VINTON _________|_______________________
| | | (1659 - 1727) m 1677
| |_Mary VINTON ________|
| (1692 - 1770) m 1710|
| | _Thomas GREENE ________
| | | (1630 - 1674) m 1651
| |_Hannah GREEN ________|_Margaret CALL ________
| (1659 - 1741) m 1677 (1631 - 1667)
|
|--Micah THAYER
| (1774 - 1848)
| _______________________
| |
| ______________________|_______________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|_______________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _______________________
| | | |
| | | ______________________|_______________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|
| | |
| | | _______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|_______________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _______________________
| |
| ______________________|_______________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _______________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|_______________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _______________________
| |
| ______________________|_______________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _______________________
| |
|______________________|_______________________
[45457] Find A Grave memorial 17557883 offers: "Parents: Micah and Priscilla (Orcutt) Thayer. Husband of: 1. Phebe (Stetson) Thayer, and 2. Roxanna (Drake) Thayer. Married: 28 Jan 1841 in Stoughton, Norfolk, MA.