___________________________________
|
_George (Jr) ARNOLD __|___________________________________
| (.... - 1823) m 1780
_Johannes ("John") ARNOLD _|
| (1797 - 1865) |
| | _George Michael BREINER ___________
| | | (.... - 1782)
| |_Catherine BREINER ___|_Catharina Magdalena (Ley or) LOY _
| (.... - 1836) m 1780 (1742 - 1806)
_George ARNOLD ______|
| (1828 - 1900) m 1849|
| | _Johan Friederich GOTSCHALK _______+
| | | (1751 - 1837) m 1797
| | _Solomon GUTSHALL ____|_Eva BEST _________________________
| | | (1788 - 1864) m 1853 (1758 - 1856)
| |_Susan ("Susie") GUTSHALL _|
| (1809 - 1887) |
| | _George SHREFFLER _________________+
| | | (1759 - 1828) m 1783
| |_Christina SHREFFLER _|_Magaretha Elizabeth KOCHENDEFFER _
| (1788 - ....) m 1853 (1770 - 1829)
_John Peter ARNOLD __|
| (1852 - 1928) m 1876|
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| | ______________________|___________________________________
| | |
| | ___________________________|
| | | |
| | | | ___________________________________
| | | | |
| | | |______________________|___________________________________
| | |
| |_Margaretha GILCHER _|
| (1831 - 1921) m 1849|
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| | ______________________|___________________________________
| | |
| |___________________________|
| |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| |______________________|___________________________________
|
|
|--Margaretha Rhoda ARNOLD
| (1888 - 1988)
| ___________________________________
| |
| ______________________|___________________________________
| |
| ___________________________|
| | |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|___________________________________
| |
| _Joseph JOHNSTON ____|
| | (1818 - 1893) |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | | ______________________|___________________________________
| | | |
| | |___________________________|
| | |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |______________________|___________________________________
| |
|_Nancy JOHNSTON _____|
(1856 - 1943) m 1876|
| ___________________________________
| |
| _Nathan GASKILL ______|___________________________________
| | (1774 - 1841) m 1797
| _Joseph GASKILL ___________|
| | (1798 - 1866) m 1819 |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |_Hannah OWEN _________|___________________________________
| | (1774 - 1845) m 1797
|_Hannah GASKILL _____|
(1825 - 1901) |
| _William PENNOCK __________________+
| | (1750 - 1816) m 1773
| _John PENNOCK ________|_Mary MARTIN ______________________
| | (1774 - 1837) m 1811 (.... - 1843)
|_Elizabeth PENNOCK ________|
(1798 - 1890) m 1819 |
| ___________________________________
| |
|_Hannah HARRIS _______|___________________________________
(1775 - 1811) m 1811
[54327] The unverified file GSYN-6G1 in familysearch.org offers: "Sarah Jane Davis was born about 1842, in Washington, Knox, Maine, United States. She had at least 1 son and 1 daughter with Hiram Hatch Stetson. She lived in Chelsea, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States in 1870 and Revere, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States in 1880."
___________________________________
|
____________________________________|___________________________________
|
______________________________|
| |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| |____________________________________|___________________________________
|
_Bernhard VON SUPPLINBURG _|
| (.... - 1063) |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| | ____________________________________|___________________________________
| | |
| |______________________________|
| |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| |____________________________________|___________________________________
|
_Gebhard VON SUPPLINBURG _|
| (1040 - 1075) |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| | ____________________________________|___________________________________
| | |
| | ______________________________|
| | | |
| | | | ___________________________________
| | | | |
| | | |____________________________________|___________________________________
| | |
| |_Ida VON QUERFURT _________|
| |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| | ____________________________________|___________________________________
| | |
| |______________________________|
| |
| | ___________________________________
| | |
| |____________________________________|___________________________________
|
|
|--Lothar von Supplinburg, EMPEROR
| (1075 - 1137)
| ___________________________________
| |
| _Thimo I, Count of FORMBACH ________|___________________________________
| | (.... - 1002)
| _Thimo II, Count of FORMBACH _|
| | (.... - 1049) |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |____________________________________|___________________________________
| |
| _Frédéric of FORMBACH ___|
| | |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | | ____________________________________|___________________________________
| | | |
| | |______________________________|
| | |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |____________________________________|___________________________________
| |
|_Edith of FORMBACH _______|
(.... - 1078) |
| _Dietrich I, Count of BRANDENBURG _+
| | (.... - 0985)
| _Bernard, Margrave of the NORDMARK _|___________________________________
| | (.... - 1051)
| _Conrad Count, HALDENSLEBEN __|
| | (.... - 1056) |
| | | ___________________________________
| | | |
| | |____________________________________|___________________________________
| |
|_Gertrude of HALDENSLEBEN _|
(.... - 1116) |
| ___________________________________
| |
| ____________________________________|___________________________________
| |
|______________________________|
|
| ___________________________________
| |
|____________________________________|___________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothar_II,_Holy_Roman_Emperor offers: "A note on the ordinal: The numbering of German rulers generally follows a sequence that leads back to the Carolingian empire and the East Frankish kingdom that emerged from it. Lothair III is thus seen as a successor of Emperor Lothair I (ruled 843-855) and King Lothair II of Lotharingia (ruled 855-869), most of whose kingdom was eventually absorbed into Germany. However, because Lothair II was not Emperor and did not rule Germany proper, some historians do not count him in the German sequence and thus call Lothair of Supplinburg Lothair II rather than Lothair III.
Rise to power: Little is known of Lothair's youth. He was a posthumous child, born in June 1075 shortly after his father, Gebhard of Supplinburg, died in battle against the Emperor Henry IV. After years of purchasing lands or gaining them via inheritance or marriage alliances throughout Saxony, Lothair gained the domains of the Billung, Nordheim and Brunswick families and became one of the dominant landowners in the northern duchy. He was made Duke of Saxony in 1106 by Emperor Henry V in exchange for his help against Henry's father, Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor. Emboldened by the promotion, and incensed over the imposition of a new tax on ducal lords, Lothair subsequently revolted against Henry's rule and denied Henry's ability to rule Saxony during the Investiture Controversy. In 1115 his forces defeated those of the Emperor in the Battle of Welfesholz.
When Henry died in 1125, Lothair was viewed by the imperial chancellor, the Archbishop of Mainz, as a perfect candidate. As an extensive landowner, he brought power to the table, but he was old (slightly over fifty years of age) and had no male issue, potentially making him malleable for the nobility. He was therefore elected king of Germany after a contentious power struggle with Frederick II, Duke of Swabia, head of the Hohenstaufen. His election was notable in that it marked a departure from the concept of hereditary succession. Somewhat naive concerning the complex power struggle between the papacy and the empire, Lothair also consented to several symbolic acts that were subsequently interpreted by Rome as signaling acceptance of papal confirmation of his position.
A campaign undertaken in the same year against Bohemia ended in defeat, making for a less than great start by Lothair. Among those imprisoned by the Bohemians was Albert of Ascanian, future Margrave of Brandenburg.
Dispute with the Staufens: During his reign, a succession dispute broke out between the houses of Welf and Staufen, the latter which was led by Frederick II and his brother Duke Conrad of Franconia. The Staufens, in addition to claiming the private Salian lands which clearly fell to them, also claimed all of the crown lands gained under Henry IV and Henry V. Lothair's attempts to seize the crown lands following approval from a group of nobles meeting in Regensburg provoked Staufen reaction. Frederick of Swabia was placed under the imperial ban, Conrad was deprived of Franconia, and the rectorate of Burgundy passed to Conrad of Zähringen.
The Staufens, who had the support of their own lands plus support in many imperial cities, Austria and the Duchy of Swabia, raised Conrad as anti-king Conrad III. In 1128 he was crowned King of Italy by the Anselm V, Archbishop of Milan. Lothair took advantage of Conrad's expedition into Italy and his lack of resources by attacking the Staufens in Germany. Nürnberg and Speyer, two strong cities in support of the opposition, fell in 1129. Conrad's failure to make anything of his position in Italy, causing him to return in 1130 without anything to show for it, assured at least a partial victory for the king.
Relations with the Papacy: In the double papal election of 1130, both sides campaigned for Lothair's support. The king had an opportunity to take advantage of the situation and reassert imperial control over the papacy, but choosing instead to deal with the Staufen resistance, he let his inferiors make the decision. Anacletus II offered Lothair the Imperial crown, but in the end Innocent II gained his support, and he promised to escort the new pope back to Rome. In 1131 the two met at Liège, where the king demonstrated subservience to the pope, and his request that investiture be restored to him was ignored. He also agreed to assist Innocent against King Roger II of Sicily, an ally of Anacletus.
The force Lothair took with him into Italy in 1132 was not strong, due to his leaving troops in Germany to prevent the Hohenstaufen from revolting. Carefully avoiding the cities, which were hostile, he reached Rome in 1133, which was mostly held by Anacletus. As St. Peter's Basilica was closed to them, Innocent instead crowned Lothair as emperor in the Lateran. The emperor continued giving little or no resistance against papal interference with his power; he even ignored a bull by Innocent which stated that the emperor's authority derived from him. He also recognized papal claims to the Matildine lands (formerly owned by Countess Matilda), in exchange receiving those lands as fiefs.
Campaign against Sicily: Returning to Germany, he set out to create peace. The Staufen brothers, falling short on resources, were compelled to submit. The Reichstag in Bamberg in 1135 pardoned the two brothers and restored them to their lands. In return, they recognized Lothair as emperor and promised to assist him in another Italian campaign, and a ten-year Landpeace was declared.
In 1136, at the insistence of Innocent and Byzantine Emperor John II Comnenus, the campaign began, directed against Roger of Sicily. Two main armies, one led by Lothair, the other by Henry the Proud of Bavaria, entered Italy. On the river Tronto, Count William of Loritello did homage to Lothair and opened the gates of Termoli to him. This was followed by Count Hugh II of Molise. Advancing deep into the southern part of the peninsula, the two armies met at Bari, and continued further south in 1137. Roger offered to give Apulia as a fief of the Empire to one of his sons and give another son as a hostage -- terms which Lothair refused after being pressured by Innocent.
The German troops, however, were adamant against campaigning during the hot summer and revolted. The emperor, who had hoped for the complete conquest of Sicily, instead separated Capua and Apulia from Roger's kingdom and gave them to Roger's enemies. Innocent, however, protested, claiming that Apulia fell under papal claims; the two eventually jointly enfeoffed the duchy to Rainulf of Alife. Lothair turned north, but died while crossing the Alps in December 1137. Shortly beforehand, he gave his Tuscan Matildine lands to his son-in-law, Henry the Proud of Bavaria, and his last acts were to give him also the Duchy of Saxony and the imperial regalia. However, the kingship subsequently ended up in the hands of the Staufens, destroying Lothair's hopes for a powerful Welf hereditary monarchy. He is entombed in the monastery church of Königslutter.
Actions in the North and East: The emperor's most long-lasting contribution to Germany came from his actions in the north and east. Being a Saxon, he gave more attention to the region than previous emperors. Even before becoming German king, he had given control of Holstein and Stormarn to Adolf I of Schauenburg. In 1134 he appointed the Ascanian Albert as margrave of Brandenburg. In 1136 he appointed Conrad the Great of Wettin, already margrave of Meissen, to the position of margrave of Lausitz, uniting the two marches. In addition, he petitioned the pope to expand the rights of the Archbishops of Bremen and Magdeburg in the area. King Eric II of Denmark was made a vassal of the emperor in 1135, becoming a member of the Reichstag. Successful diplomatic intervention by Lothair in ending war between Poland and Bohemia resulted in the Polish Duke's Boleslaw III Wrymouth submission and his payment of tribute that was long overdue. In addition, the Polish Duke had to accept Pomerania and Rügen as fiefs of the Empire.
Issue: By his wife, Richeza of Northeim, Lothair had only one surviving child, a daughter Gertrude, born 1118. In order to secure Welf support for his election, Lothair married Gertrude to Henry the Proud, the duke of Bavaria, in 1127. Their son was Henry the Lion."
__
|
__|__
|
__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_William HALLETT ____|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Andrew HALLETT ___________|
| m 1598 |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| | __|
| | | |
| | | | __
| | | | |
| | | |__|__
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--Andrew (Sr.) HALLETT
| (.... - 1648)
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | | __|__
| | | |
| | |__|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_Beatrice (Beatrix) KNOTE _|
m 1598 |
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|__|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
"Ancestral Heads of New England Families," Frank R. Holmes (Baltimore: Genealogical Pub. Co., 1999), p. cvi states the surname is from "Little Hal or Henry, the diminutive termination ett being added.... Andrew came to Plymouth Colony, 1637, proprietor at Dorchester, Mass., 1638, removed to Sandwich, Mass., afterwards to Yarmouth, Mass." Basic information is in "The Great Migration...1634-1635" (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2003), Vol. 3, pp. 195-200.
Andrew was baptised 19-May-1607 at Symondsbury, Dorsetshire, England, and sailed 20-Mar-1635 from Weymouth, Dorsetshire, England to Massachusetts. His wife was Mary _______. He brought his wife and several children to Lynn, Mass. in 1636, then to Plymouth, 1637, and Sandwich, 1638. He appears to have been the schoolmaster. He was a proprietor in Yarmouth, 1639 (owning 200 acres, including the tidal pond and mill; most of his land was in what became Barnstable). He was taxed in Bowood, Dorset, England in 1640 on a subsidy - not many of the New England immigrants are found on these subsidies, as only a few of them were freeholders - the subsidies were a special tax which Parliament permitted the king to levy on landowners who had sufficient personal property to make collection of taxes cost-effective. At his death, Andrew left a cow to Yarmouth for the use of the poor. {-cf."Parentage of Andrew Hallett of Yarmouth, Mass.," by John G, Hunt, in "The American Genealogist," April, 1961, pp. 84-5} An "Andrewe Hallett, age 28, servant to Richard Wade" is on a list of persons bound from Weymouth to New England dated 20 March 1635/36 in "The Complete Book of Immigrants, 1607-1660", Peter Wilson Coldham (1988). The Hallett family is also treated in "Genealogical Notes of Barnstable Families," C. F. Swift (Barnstable, MA: F.B. & F.P. Goss, 1888) and Family Tree Maker's CD 194, "Cape Cod Library," I:1244. Also see NEHGR (1946) 100:220, and "Pioneers of Massachusetts - 1620-1650," Charles Henry Pope (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2013), p. 209.
----- From: eberan@juno.com (Evelyn S. Beran) 5 Jan 1998:
The book by Janet Elaine (Hallett) Smith ["The Hallett History" (December, 1994: VanJan Publishing Co., 190 Filmore Avenue, Grand Forks ND 58201); (701)775-4357] has some thoroughly enjoyable narrative about both Andrew Sr. and Andrew Jr., Andrew Jr.'s will and inventory, and pictures of Stedcombe House in Devon, built by a Richard Hallett about 1697 -- probably a "cousin" to our line. The rest is on more recent generations. But she does nothing to solve our identity questions regarding Andrew & Beatrix, Andrew Sr. and Mary, and Andrew Jr. She cites Otis, Savage, Banks, and inquired of mystery writer Mary Higgins Clark, who wrote a story about a Hallett family in England, and who set her well-researched story in the Hallett house in Devon; also a reply from Elizabeth Murray, a literary researcher who worked with Clark, who reported that Stedcome House was destroyed during the English Civil War and rebuilt by Richard Hallett 40 years later. And that the Halletts had made their money in the West Indies. Janet Hallett Smith notes family stories that at least some of the New England Halletts were involved in rum running. One story is that some of the rum was hidden in a certain "Widow Hallett's barn," and in order to keep anyone from finding it, she gradually drank it all herself! Story not proven to Janet's satisfaction, but fun. She identifies the Andrew Hallett who came at age 28, servant of Richard Wade, age 60, as Andrew Hallett Sr. She cites Banks' Topographical Dictionary that Andrew Hallet came from the parish of Stoke Abbott (or Stoke Abbas), and that "Andrew Hallett of our Yarmouth" paid subsidies in Bowood in Dorset. Another reference under South Bowood/Stoke Abbortt: "Narcissus Pavye (paid) for Andrew Hallet now in New England" -- presumably the subsidy. Another reference is that twice Andrew Hallet signed the Protestations Returns (1642 onwards); these were signed by Protestants, but refused by Catholics and Dissenters. He signed these in the parish of Netherbury. Cites that Savage refers to Andrew as going home about 1645 but soon coming again. Smith pondered why "gentleman" Andrew, obviously a man of good estate, came as an indentured servant to Richard Wade. Her investigation led her to "a tradition in Dorset England, that Andrew Hallett Sr. wrote to some of his relatives congratulating himself on his cleverness in outsmarting the ship line. If he came as the gentleman he was, he would have had to pay his own fare, as well as that of his wife and all six children. So he persuaded a cooper, Richard Wade, age 60, to list him as an indentured servant in exchange for paying one-half of the fare for Richard Wade. As a result, Andrew Hallett was able to transport his entire family to the colonies for only one-half one one fare, rather than the eight fares he should have paid. Further information from this purported letter told that when they got off the boat in the new land, Richard Wade began to give Mr. Hallett orders, to which Mr. Hallett replied, "I am on free soil now; no one shall ever again tell me what to do." And, according to records of people who knew him in America (including Gov. William Bradford, who confirmed this story in some of his writings), 'no one ever did!'"
-----
Of Andrew Jr. she says: "Of the children of Andrew Hallett Sr. 'His other children were better educated; but, notwithstanding, Andrew was the most respectable and succeeded best in life.'" [MY NOTE: the discrepancy in education might also be explained by Andrew Jr. being nephew rather than son of Andrew Sr. -- hence educated in a different family.]
"Andrew Hallett Jr. married Ann Besse. She was the daughter of Anthony Besse of either Lynn or Sandwich. According to tradition, she was only fourteen years old when they married, but she was said to be a strong healthy woman, and that she was the mother of twins before her fifteenth birthday. The tradition further relates that on the day following the birth of her children she requested her mother, who acted as nurse, to take care of the babies while she went out to seek birds eggs for them. The grandmother at that time could not have been over thirty, for she had children of her own fifteen years younger than her grandchild Abigail, and if Ruhama was one of the twins, not far from twenty. They lived in Sandwich until July 28, 1640, when he sold his farm to Daniel Wing and Andrew moved to Yarmouth, where he lived until his death in 1684. Following in the Hallett tradition which had been established by his father, Andrew Jr. eventually became the largest land holder in Yarmouth, owning about three hundred acres of the best lands and meadows in the town. He owned so much property on both sides of the main lane that it was eventually named "Hallett Street," which it is still called today. He also owned lands and meadows in Barnstable, 1000 acres in Windham, Conn., and approximately 500 acres more just outside Yarmouth. "Again turning to Amos Otis, we learn more of Andrew Jr.'s reputation. "The mode in which he acquired his large estate I shall attempt to elucidate. Two words, industry and economy, are the keys which unlock the whole mystery....
"Andrew Hallett Jr. did not acquire his wealth by official services. His name frequently occurs on the records, but not in connection with any office that conferred much honor or afford him large emoluments. In 1642, '56 and '58 he was a surveyor of highways; in 1651 and 1679 constable. In 1659 he was appointed by the Court one of a committee to raise money for the support of the ministry in Yarmouth. In 1660, '67 and '75 he was on the grand jury; and Oct. 30, 1667 he was appointed by the Colony Court, at the request of the town, a member of the land committee of Yarmouth. None of these are offices of honor or profit; but they show that he was a man in whom his neighbors had confidence, that he was a man of common sense and sound judgment. When a young man he was unable to write, yet soon after he came to Yarmouth he acquired that art, for in 1659 I find his name subscribed to the verdict of a jury of inquest. "He took the oath of fidelity while a resident in Sandwich, and his name and that of his father appears on the list of those who were able to bear arms in Yarmouth in August 1643. On the criminal calendar his name does not appear. In those times the most trifling faults were noted, and he who escaped a prosecution must necessarily have lived a blameless life. He also kept his name off of the civil docket.... He was a member of the church in Yarmouth; but circumstances show that he did not entirely acquiese in all the crude notions promulgated by Mr. Matthews. He often attended the meetings of Mr. Lothrop, and Mr. Walley, and some of the members of his family afterward joined the Barnstable church.... One of the major points of interest which ran through the Hallett family was the type of houses in which they lived. Andrew Hallet Jr.'s house is dscribed thusly by Amos Otis: "The house which he bought of Gyles Hopkins in 1642, was probably the same that Mr. Stephen Hopkins built in the summer of 1638, and if so, was the first house built by the English on Cape Cod below Sandwich. it was small and poorly constructed, and was occupied as a dwelling not many years.... It probably contained at first only one room. The excavation into the hill, and the chimney, covered nearly the whole of the west side, and the other three sides were covered with hand-sawed or hew planks, and the roof with thatch. The walls were not shingled on the outside, or plastered on the in. The seams in the boarding were filled or "daubed" with clay. Oiled paper supplied the place of glass....
"The second house in which Andrew Hallett Jr. resided in Yarmouth stood on the west side of the mill road. Family tradition says that Andrew Hallett built the house himself. "The new house was built on a little knoll, and fronted due south, as all ancient dwellings did. By such a location, our fathers secured two objects which they considered essential: the rays of the sun at noon, or dinnertime, as they called that hour of the day, shone parallel with the side of the house, and their "great room" in which they lived, was on the sunny or warm side of the house. The chimney was uniformly built on the west side, and projected outside of the frame. The exact size of Andrew Hallett's new house cannot be stated accurately: it was about 22 feet by 26 on the ground, and was only about one or one and one-half stories high. The "great room" about 17 feet square, occupied the southeast corner. The fireplace was eight feet wide and four deep, and the mantle, which was of wood, was laid about five feet and a half high, so that the family could pass to the oven, which opened on the back of the fireplace near the south corner. There was a small kitchen or work room at the northwest corner; at the northeast corner a small pantry, with a trap door leading to the cellar. Between the pantry and the great room was a bed-room, the floor of which was elevated about two feet, to give greater depth to the cellar. The bed occupied near all the space, and it was so low in the walls that a tall person could not stand upright therein. A ladder in the front entry led to the chamber, which was occupied for weaving and lodging rooms. No part of the house was ever painted or any of the rooms papered. The windows were of small diamond shaped glass set in lead. No blinds or curtains were needed, and none were ever used. The furniture of the house was for use, not for show.... He had one of the lushest orchards in Massachusetts, setting goals for others to try to achieve. He had Kentish Cherry trees brought over by the Pilgrims, which rapidly multiplied by suckers and were set on the outer edge to protect the other less hardy trees. He raised apple trees from seeds, brought from England. The pignose--a good winter apple--was the most productive. The Foxwell was a fall apple of fair quality. He also had pear trees, raised from seeds, but they did not prove to live long. He also had French sugar pear trees, which he grafted into the poorer pear seedlings and which survived quite well. 'Goodman' Hallett, as he was called, was referred to as a husbandman. By honest industry, skillful management and economy, he accumulated a large estate. In 1676 his tax was one twentieth of the taxes of all of Yarmouth. "He was a very practical man. The furniture in his house bore witness to his belief that "nothing was valuable that was not useful." "A large house makes a slave of the wife, and elegant furniture drouges of the daughters," he was quoted as saying to his neighbors. He had Indian servants who assisted him in the labors of his fields. He never expected them to do anything he was not willing to do himself. When asked why he lived in so small a house, he is said to have replied, "Comfort lives in a small house and needs no servants: care in a large one, and requires many." He was also very cautious of spending money. "Daylight," he would say, "was cheaper than candlelight" and as soon as the day broke he was up and dressed. He was a man of faith, beginning each day around the breakfast table with the odler daughter reading a passage from the Bible, singing a few stanzas from a favorite hymn and Goodman Hallett kneeling down in prayer, asking God's blessing and protection on his country, his church, his household and his dear friends in England. "He loved to tell stories to his children about "home," as he called Old England. "He was handy with all types of chores, from the making of andirons for the fireplace to the making of shoes for his family. He demanded the same industrious spirit from his wife and children. "The girl who did not know that the dishwater should be heating during meal time is unfit to be married," he told his daughter, Abigail, when she was in her teens. His wife was an expert weaver and seamstress, a craft which was handed down to many future generations. "Goodman" Hallett died in the spring of 1684. He was at least 70 years of age. All of his children had married and left home...." The inventory of the estate was appraised by John Miller and John Thacher on 19 May 1684 and signed by his widow, Ann Hallet 31 May 1684 (copy of inventory included). Ann Hallett continued to live in the easterly part of the house; her grandson John Bourne lived with her and her son Jonathan occupied the west part of the house. She died in the spring of 1694, leaving a will dated June 23 1684. Her wearing apparel, consisting of articles of wool, linen and silk, hose shoes, hat, etc., was appraised at L15-00-00 or 50 dollars in silver money, showing that on the Sabbath and holidays she dressed in great style. There is a sketch of the interior layout of the home, and a copy of Andrew Hallett Jr.'s will.
Smith includes narrative about daughter Abigail and her marriage to Captain John Alden Jr. (son of John Alden and Priscilla Mullins) on 10 Dec 1672; he was 17 years older than Abigail. In 1692 he was accused of witchcraft -- there is narrative about the incident, taken from "The Witches of Salem."
Martha Bourne, daughter of Bathsheba Hallett and Richard Bourne, married John Bradford, son of Dorothy and William Bradford. She includes some interesting narrative about Dorothy Bradford.
---
A young girl, Maria Hallett, recognized as a descendant of Andrew Hallett, but whose ancestry is not spelled out, (identified by Smith as probably the daughter of John Hallett), was at Crosby's Tavern one night when a terrible storm forced a ship full of seamen to come ashore to wait out the storm. The storm lasted several days and during that time Maria (age 16) had an affair with a sailor, Samuel Bellamy, and by the time he left port she was carrying his baby. It is said he promised Maria he would return for her once he had amassed a fortune for her. Soon afterwards he was considered one of the most notorious pirates to sail the seas. Maria's baby died the same night it was born and people said it was because "Black Sam is the devil in the flesh, and Maria has consorted with the devil." She was accused of witchcraft. On Cape Cod the witches were sentences to jail rather than hanged. After a few days, Maria's father was able to convince the town council (with a great deal of money), that Maria was not dangerous and should be freed. They forbade her to live in the town, however, and she resided all her days in a little shanty across a field of poverty grass which was known as "Goody Hallett's meadow." She was well-known for weaving the most beautiful fabrics in all of Massachusetts, and although people were forbidden to visit her, many risked being stoned to cross the meadow and purchase her fine fabrics.
The National Geographic of July 1975 published an article about Cape Cod which included the story of Maria Hallett and Black Sam Bellamy. "It even elaborated further, claiming that "she sat, keeping watch on the shore, waiting for the return of her lover, Black Sam Bellamy, warning the sailors of danger by tying lanterns on the tails of whales." ... "The magazine account goes on to tell of the red slippers she always wore, and that on April 22, 1751, she succombed to the sea and was demolished by one of the whales off the coast. Further proof of this lies in the fact that when one of the whales was captured and cut open, inside they found Maria's red slippers." "The Encyclopedia Americana" says of Samuel Bellamy, "a notorious pirate, was wrecked in his ship, the Whidah, of 23 guns and 130 men, off Wellfleet, on Cape Cod, in April 1717, after having captures several vessels on the coast and an indecisive engagement with a French ship proceeding to Quebec. Only one Indian and one Englishman escaped of his crew. Six of the pirates, who had been run ashore when drunk a few days previous, by the captain of the captured vessel, were hung in Boston in November 1717. "Black Sam," as he was known by then, was never seen again, nor was his body ever recovered." "The Whidah, Black Sam's ship, was lost off the coast and it was not until a crew who specialize in searching for lost sailing vessels found the remains just off the coast of Cape Cod, near Wellfleet. Did Black Sam ever know that he had a son who died at birth? Was he returning to bring his fortunes to Maria? No one will ever know, but there were huge amounts of Spanish gold on board when it was located, as well as mammoth emeralds from Colombia. When was the ship found? Not until 1992!"
Her pedigree chart shows: Generation 1: Androwe HALLET b. England, m. Betryx KNOTE 1598, Symonsbury, England. Generation 2: Andrew HALLETT Sr., b. Symonsbury, England (elsewhere she says about 1607), m. Mary, came to America in 1635 and lived in Yarmouth MA; died Yarmouth MA about 1652; Mary died about 1660 at Yarmouth. Generation 3: Andrew HALLETT Jr., born about 1615 in England; married Ann BESSE, daughter of Anthony of Lynn and Sandwich, died spring 1694; Ann died 1684 at Yarmouth MA.
The only way I [Evelyn] can believe this sequence is If Andrew Sr. was son of Andrew and Beatrix, born as the first child of their marriage about 1599, although christened in 1607. If born in 1599, he would be 16 at the birth of Andrew Jr. in 1615 -- and that is pushing it, by my logic. If born about 1607, he'd be much to young to be the father of a son born 1615. But the Andrew who came about 1635 was age 28 (born about 1607) and Smith identifies that one as Andrew Sr. by her narrative based on English tradition... Ann Besse, by tradition, married Andrew Jr. at age 14 and had twins by age 15 -- I have the twins' birth as 1644. That would guestimate Andrew Jr. and Ann's marriage as 1643, and Anne's birth at 1629. And make Andrew Jr., if born 1615, 29 at marriage -- not unrealistic. But also probably a nephew rather than a son of Andrew Sr., IF Andrew Sr. is the immigrant with Richard Wade in 1635!!
For the culture of New England during his lifetime and beyond, see "Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America," David Hackett Fischer (NY: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 13-205.
[40752] The unverified Klock tree in Ancestry.com in 2016 offers: "Johannes 'John' S. Hoffman was born on January 17, 1776, in Colebrookdale, Pennsylvania. He married Susanna Drumheller in Berks County, Pennsylvania. They had five children during their marriage. He died on May 5, 1835, in Northumberland, Pennsylvania, at the age of 59. . . . Susanna Drumheller was born on January 25, 1782, the child of Johanne Nicholas and Catherine. . . . . She died on September 19, 1869, in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, having lived a long life of 87 years."
[57302] Catherine is daughter of Peter Hunter (1851-1910) & Elizabeth McAdam (1852-1902; m. 11 August 1874 in East Kilbride, Lanarkshire, Scotland).
_Robert KINSMAN _____+
| (1603 - 1664)
_Robert KINSMAN _____|_____________________
| (1629 - 1712) m 1652
_Joseph KINSMAN _____|
| (1673 - 1741) |
| | _Thomas BOREMAN _____+
| | | (.... - 1679) m 1630
| |_Mary BOREMAN _______|_Margaret OFFING ____
| (1631 - ....) m 1652 (1610 - 1679)
_Benjamin KINSMAN ___|
| (1719 - 1794) m 1740|
| | _Robert DUTCH _______
| | | (1623 - 1686)
| | _John DUTCH _________|_Mary KIMBALL _______
| | | (1646 - 1685) (.... - 1686)
| |_Susanna DUTCH ______|
| (1675 - 1734) |
| | _Walter ROPER _______+
| | | (1614 - 1680)
| |_Elizabeth ROPER ____|_____________________
| (.... - 1692)
_Nathaniel KINSMAN __|
| (1745 - ....) m 1768|
| | _John PERKINS _______+
| | | (1609 - 1686)
| | _Jacob PERKINS ______|_____________________
| | | (1646 - 1719)
| | _Robert PERKINS _____|
| | | (1695 - ....) m 1718|
| | | | _Robert KINSMAN _____+
| | | | | (1629 - 1712) m 1652
| | | |_Sarah KINSMAN ______|_Mary BOREMAN _______
| | | (1659 - ....) (1631 - ....)
| |_Elizabeth PERKINS __|
| (.... - 1806) m 1740|
| | _____________________
| | |
| | _____________________|_____________________
| | |
| |_Elizabeth DOUTON ___|
| (.... - 1763) m 1718|
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|_____________________
|
|
|--Ezekiel KINSMAN
|
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | | _____________________|_____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
|_Sarah COGSWELL _____|
m 1768 |
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | _____________________
| | | |
| | |_____________________|_____________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________|_____________________
| |
|_____________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|_____________________|_____________________
[33893] His information is from the unverified information posted by Stevan Thorpe at http://familytreemaker.genealogy.comin 2012 which offers: "Ezekiel Kinsman (son of Nathaniel Kinsman and Sarah Cogswell). He married (1) Mary Chase on April 12, 1798 in King Co., Nova Scotia, daughter of Joseph Chase and Hannah. He married (2) Mary Nesbitt on April 30, 1812 in King Co., Nova Scotia, daughter of Joseph Nesbitt and Rebecca."
__
|
__|__
|
__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Endreas RIEHM ______|
| (1622 - 1663) |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
_Hans Andreas RIEHM _|
| (1642 - 1719) m 1665|
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| | __|
| | | |
| | | | __
| | | | |
| | | |__|__
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | __
| | |
| | __|__
| | |
| |__|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|__
|
|
|--Johann Eberhardt RIEHM
| (1687 - 1779)
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | | __|__
| | | |
| | |__|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_Maria WEYNANT ______|
(1645 - 1699) m 1665|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
| __|
| | |
| | | __
| | | |
| | |__|__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
| __|__
| |
|__|
|
| __
| |
|__|__
[25033] This line is from a posting in One World Tree on Ancestry.com, and is not verified.
__________________________________
|
_________________________________|__________________________________
|
_____________________|
| |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| |_________________________________|__________________________________
|
_______________________|
| |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| | _________________________________|__________________________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| |_________________________________|__________________________________
|
_John de ST JOHN ______|
| (1273 - 1329) |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| | _________________________________|__________________________________
| | |
| | _____________________|
| | | |
| | | | __________________________________
| | | | |
| | | |_________________________________|__________________________________
| | |
| |_______________________|
| |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| | _________________________________|__________________________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| | __________________________________
| | |
| |_________________________________|__________________________________
|
|
|--Margaret de ST JOHN
| (.... - 1361)
| _Renauld (Reginald) DE COURTENAY _+
| | (.... - 1194)
| _Robert DE COURTENAY ____________|_Hawise DE COURCY ________________
| | m 1213 (.... - 1219)
| _John DE COURTENAY __|
| | (.... - 1274) |
| | | _William DE VERNON _______________+
| | | | (.... - 1217)
| | |_Mary DE VERNON _________________|_Maud DE BEAUMONT ________________
| | m 1213
| _Hugh DE COURTENAY ____|
| | (1250 - 1292) |
| | | _Robert DE VERE __________________+
| | | | m 1207
| | | _Hugh de Vere, Baron DE BOLEBEC _|_Isabel BOLEBEC __________________
| | | | (1210 - ....) m 1223 (1177 - 1245)
| | |_Isabel DE VERE _____|
| | |
| | | _Saire DE QUINCY _________________+
| | | | (1155 - 1219)
| | |_Hawise DE QUINCY _______________|__________________________________
| | (.... - 1262) m 1223
|_Isabell DE COURTENAY _|
(1283 - 1325) |
| _Thomas LE DESPENCER _____________+
| |
| _Hugh LE DESPENCER ______________|__________________________________
| | (.... - 1238)
| _Hugh LE DESPENCER __|
| | (1223 - 1265) |
| | | __________________________________
| | | |
| | |_________________________________|__________________________________
| |
|_Eleanor LE DESPENCER _|
(.... - 1328) |
| _Alan BASSETT ____________________+
| | (1155 - 1233)
| _Sir Philip BASSETT _____________|_Aline DE GRAY ___________________
| | (.... - 1271) (1159 - ....)
|_Aline BASSET _______|
|
| _Matthew DE LOUVAIN ______________+
| |
|_Hawise DE LOUVAIN ______________|__________________________________